Adress to everyone who says: “Oh, that’s so cruel!
How could he do that? He was like an angel!
How could he do that to us?”
Michael Jackson, the kid has been over at his five. He really was but gone at once. And the next step forward with the childhood theme bespeaks a most mature personality goes all the way consciously against pharisiac public opinion. A real kid would never addict his childness. There is a point just for deeply full-grown human being able to see thr true value of a cap and feather days, the only time a man could get the absolute of the happiness. In early infancy, when everybody wakes up to the difference between a potty and a toilet bowl, Mr. Jackson already had no choice but to grow up. “I didn’t have it then, I compensate for that… I find the thing I never had through them.” – Isn’t it quiet unchildish words?
Let’s go back to 2003-2005 (as well as 1993). Imagine the trial in its great depth, not abstarctedly. Picture this point by point, in the smallest details before you judge the recent Jackson’s show as cruel.
Fit on it – two years under the pressure of the real threat of twenty years prison term –
ISN’T IT CRUEL?
Imagine they drill up the locks in your house and put into public domain the fact that pornography was found in -what a surprise! – is not homosexual. Isn’t it cruel? Imagine the perfect strangers came again to take pictures of your cock, your ass and any other area of your body you trying hard to hide for esthetic motives. Imagine these perfect strangers took these pictures to show other perfect strangers simply and solely to discuss it, to contrast it and to identity it all around.
Great, isn’t it?
Imagine bloody false allegations came from someone you came to help. Someone you’ve done your best to help. The act of deliberate treachery – Isn’t it cruel enough? Wanna be in Mr. Jackson’s shoes? When you’re holding on by only thought you talk to yourself again and again: “You’re not the unhappiest guy in the world. That must be someone.. That must be somebody else unhappier than you are.” Fit it on all over again, get into every particular and realize the unbearable darkness of his being at the time, as entirely as you ever could.
CRUEL… TO WHOM?
Cruel to his family? They are obviously in it.
Cruel to his kids? They are happy enough starring in daddy’s greatest game show.
To fans? Well, let’s fans ask themselves a question. What good did them do for him within his lifetime to bind him to put their interests above? They would tell, “We loved him!”
But where were they in all their actual love, when NYC street’s air was full of filth, mud and dirt he was lynched with got off the ground? Where the hell everybody gadding about that time? What the hell was everybody gadding about?
Where were all these charities and welfare funds sucked out his money all over the world not to petition for defense of him? Had they anything special to do? What were they busy with? What the devil were they about at the time? Where were the hell protest marches? Where were long-term mass-hunger-strikes in front of tabloids’ office buildings? Where were starry friends one and all with few exceptions let on they were totally out of any relations to this queerly affectionate with kids freaky guy?
There was a lot of indignation meetings against him. Here, there and everywhere. All around. So, what about indignation meetings for him? there was nothing. Nothing at all. There was noi aid landed. Why just a sad knot of orphah-like fans have huddled on the door-step of the courthouse till the fall of the curtain, when things have turned in his favour?
FACT: According to Gallup Poll, soon after the verdicts clearing Michael Jackson of all charges exactly on in four said they were “still a fan” of him. Almost as many said they were once fans but no longer.
Or is it cruel to public?
There is nothing sacred with public. since jesus times public was quick to exalt its heroes with only a view to cast them down.
FACT: According to Gallup Poll, 48% of Americans disagree with the verdicts clearing pop star Michael Jackson of all charges in the molest case and only 34% agree. Nearly half said they were “surprised” by the verdict, with 24% saying they were “outraged”. A clear majority, or 62% believes that Jackson’s celebrity status was a major factor in the verdict.
So is it pretty cruel to the world? Or pretty cruel from?
This world turned away from him, this dreadful world itself outraged him… This awful world laid itself out to drag him through the mire, Mr. Jackson is relatively superior to revenge the world. But he’s got his perfect freedom to leave out interests of it – where it’s at. Basically he just ignores this world as it is and his maybe-comeback would be probably filled with the ultimate humility jf the freshly reacclaimed monarch set out by the contrast of the boom around. Pseudo-death essentially is neither rude, nor cruel. It’s rather witty considering the history.
If you ever enter into the spirit of the great eccentricity, you will dig it in the shake of a hand. And the only thing that could hurt Mr. Jackson for now is a narrow-mindedness of his own audience; therefore the recent show could become the last one and the man might not be back ever.
The King had left the Kingdom because there is no Kingdom good enough for the King anymore.
He had left his audience to perceive him very whit.
Bankrupt in ability to take Michael Jackson both ambitious and modest, both calculating and unselfish, both rational and cranky. Audience bankrupt in ability to take Michael Jackson all in one – isn’t it a reason to go and not to be back? So how did he come by this stereotype that man could be either clever or kind? Why do we wish him to be pawn in someone’s hands so faithfully? Why do we need to ache for him abject and dough-face so devotedly? Why don’t we rejoice with him qualified for his throne again? Why aren’t we glad to see him told the whole world once again who is… the King?Anyhow will he be back or not he will spend his increasing yield on the same charities treated as the best drug abuse by everyone gifted with the great heart.
Now and when, Gentlemen of the Jury, we would like to call one and all sincerely distressed for Michael Jackson not to be so selfish and decide for yourself the following:
Have not Michael Joseph Jackson, the King of pop and a simply good fellow, deserved with his whole life his only right to do something ever just for himself and his family?
discover the man you never knew 
Michael Jackson is long long overdue and should put himself and his children above all people my only concern has always been for his well being, his safety and for him to know that I am forever greatful for everything he has done for people of all ages world over what he has done for me is helped me grow up with his messages of love and unity and I am deeply ashamed to be part of a society that turned on him and didnt believe in him!!
First off I have never believed the trash they put out about him. I have always admired his courage. I was a single mom working 2 & 3 jobs, all I could do was pray for him. I was never part of a society that turned against him. I believed him & in him. I am not ashamed for believing in Michael Jackson. I regret leaving W Hollywood when I was abused even than I don’t know if I could ever make a difference. I did pray for him. As I am a single mom that worked 2 & 3 jobs to raise my son. But I have to say, that Michael taught me no matter how small to give back….. Michael deserves above all else, that media to leave him alone. Stop the attacks. I get so tired & beaten defending him. There are uneducated morons out there.With that said I can’t begin to imagine how hard it’s been for him, his children now, his family.I know how frustrated I get. All I know is that Michael Jackson has given the world 45 years of love, himself, kindness, compassion & half of the world has kicked him for that the other half love him. Michael deserves to live a free person with his family. Not being able to go to a store to buy groceries, or to shop for presents. It’s awful. Isn’t it time we gave our love, thanks, gratitude back to him. Respect him, his privacy? I can honestly say as hard as I struggled to raise my son completely alone.. I never once waiver in my choice like the old tree in the book of Psalms weathering storms but standing tall. For the many that turned against him, they never saw how he was raised to love God, respect his elders & how humble he was always. I regret I couldn’t do anything to help him. I did not even know where to write him to tell him that I was behind him 110% but I know God heard my prayers. That is my only regret I did not have the money to help him. I am grateful I was not part of the society that turned against him. Michael I believed in you & will always. I know after 26 yrs of the media bs lies you have to be angry… May God bless you for all that you have & continue to do. I
I just came across this: True Facts: Michael Jackson: Neverland Kid Told Me in 2005 “Nothing Happened” to Him or to Wade Robson
Wade Robson is the young man who is now suing Michael Jackson’s estate. He claims Jackson molested him from age 7 to 14. Thanks to the re-surfacing of old “files” from the old “National Enquirer” in the British press today, I had go to back and look through my files from 2005. And what I found is pretty interesting.
I met with a young man named Bobby Newt, a kid from the files whom National Enquirer reporter Jim Mitteager targeted as a Michael Jackson “victim.” By 2005 he was an adult, and I met with him. He told me nothing happened to him. He also added that nothing happened to Wade Robson, who was then going to be a witness in the trial.
Bobby Newt and his two brothers, who wanted to be the next Jackson 5, spent two weeks with Michael at his Hayvenhurst house in Encino (this was before Neverland). This is what I wrote:
“…nothing about what Bobby Newt hears now about himself or others makes sense.
“I don’t know what to believe. He had prime time with me and my brother in the guest room for two weeks,” he said. “And he didn’t try anything.”
As a footnote to all of this: In the small world of the Los Angeles music business, Bobby Newt recently worked with choreographer and alleged Jackson “victim” Wade Robson on tracks for his first album, a potential hit compendium of original R&B ballads.
“Wade is straight as they come. He’s getting married. And nothing ever happened to him, either,” Newt said.
Published April 7, 2005
Former Protege Vouches for Jackson
No matter who testifies next in Michael Jackson‘s alleged “prior acts” of sexual abuse mini-trial, the prosecution will have to deal with the fact that only one boy will show up to say he was molested many years ago by the pop star.
Now comes Robert Newt, 30, long a “Holy Grail” for The National Enquirer from its investigation into Jackson circa 1993.
Newt and his twin brother Ronald Newt Jr. (now deceased) were aspiring performers and spent two weeks as guests in the Jackson family home in Encino, Calif., around 1985. They were about 11 years old. This all occurred before Neverland was completed. Michael, Janet Jackson and LaToya Jackson were all there, as well as the Jackson parents.
Fast-forward to December 1993. The National Enquirer, desperate to get a scoop that Jackson has abused children, heard that the Newt kids once spent time with Jackson.
The tabloid offered the Newts’ father, Ronald Newt Sr., $200,000 to say that something happened between his kids and Jackson.
Newt, a San Francisco “character” and filmmaker whose past includes pimping and jail time, considered the offer.
A contract was drawn up, signed by Enquirer editor David Perel. Enquirer reporter Jim Mitteager, who is also now deceased, met with Newt and his son at the Marriott hotel in downtown San Francisco.
It seemed that all systems were go. But the Newts declined the offer at the last minute.
Ron Newt Sr., to whom $200,000 would have seemed like the world on a silver platter, wrote “No good sucker” where his signature was supposed to go. The reason: Nothing ever happened between Jackson and the Newt boys.
Indeed, no kids, no matter how much money was dangled by the tabloids, ever showed up to trade stories of Jackson malfeasance for big lumps of cash after the first scandal broke in 1993.
“Maybe there aren’t any other kids,” a current Enquirer editor conceded.
I met Bobby Newt yesterday near the office where he works as a mortgage broker in suburban Los Angeles.
Just as his dad promised me a few days earlier, he’s a good-looking kid. He’s half black and half Chinese.
Robert and his twin brother were likely very cute kids. They have the same features as other boys advertised as alleged Neverland “victims.” But all Bobby Newt remembers of his encounter with Jackson is good times.
And all he remembers about the man from The National Enquirer is that he wanted Bobby, then 18, to lie.
“He said, ‘Say he grabbed you on the butt. Say he grabbed you and touched you in any kind of way,’” Newt said. “He told us he took all these people down. Now he was going to take Michael down. That he would really destroy him. He told us he took all these other famous people down. All the major people that had scandals against them. He said, ‘We take these people down. That’s what we do.’”
Prior to Bobby’s meeting with Mitteager, Bobby’s father met with him and brought along an intermediary, San Francisco politician, businessman and fellow jailbird Charlie Walker.
Walker is infamous in San Francisco circles for being “hooked up” to anything interesting cooking on the West Coast.
“My dad said these dudes are offering this money to take Michael Jackson down. And the guy [Mitteager] said, ‘Say he touched you. All you have to do is say it. But you might have to take the stand. You might have to go on ‘Oprah’ in front of all these people. You have to be prepared for this thing. Just say it. And we’ll give you money,’” Newt said.
Two pieces of evidence confirm the Newts’ story. One is the actual contract proffered by the Enquirer and signed by Perel, who declined to comment for this story.
The contract, written as a letter, says it’s an agreement between the tabloid and the Newts for their exclusive story regarding “your relationship with and knowledge of Michael Jackson, and his sexuality, your knowledge of Michael Jackson’s sexual contact and attempts at sexual contact with Robert Newt and others.”
Mitteager expected them to sign, even though it was completely untrue and there was, in fact, no story.
He knew you were lying, I reminded Bobby Newt.
“Exactly! And he didn’t care! He was like, ‘Just say it and we’ll give you the money.’ And I was like, ‘He [Jackson] never touched me!” Newt said. “He [Mitteager] was really fishing and really digging. Think about it — most people you say it to, ‘We’ll give you this money,’ even [if it’s not true]. And they’d take it.”
Bobby Newt recalled more details of the 30-minute meeting with The National Enquirer’s reporter:
“He was trying to coach me — if I decided to take the money, what would happen. He said ‘You know, it’s going to be a huge scandal. You’ll probably have a lot of people not liking you. You’re going to be famous!’ But to me, you’d be ruined. And the truth is Michael didn’t do anything even close to trying to molest us.”
Ironically, the second piece of evidence also backs up the Newts’ story. Unbeknownst to them, they were taped by Mitteager.
I told you last week that Mitteager did more surreptitious taping than Richard Nixon. When he died, the tapes were left to Hollywood investigator Paul Barresi. His dozens of hours of tapes include a conversation between Mitteager, Ron Newt Sr. and Charlie Walker.
When I read some of the transcript back to Newt the other day, he was shocked.
“I said all that,” he observed, surprised to have his memory prodded some 12 years later.
Back in the mid-’80s, Ron Newt Sr. put his three sons together as a singing group much as Joseph Jackson did. He called them The Newtrons.
After much pushing, he got the attention of Joe Jackson, who agreed to manage the group. Joe Jackson got the Newtrons a showcase at the Roxy in West Hollywood.
Michael showed up and loved them. The result was a two-week stay for the boys at the Encino house on Hayvenhurst Ave., where they were supposed to work on their music.
“We would see Michael in passing. We didn’t see him, maybe, because he was working on an album. We saw him downstairs in the kitchen and we talked to him,” he said.
The Newtrons eventually got a record contract and recorded the Jackson 5 hit “I Want You Back” at Hayvenhurst. They also spent the night at Tito Jackson‘s house. But nothing about what Bobby Newt hears now about himself or others makes sense.
“I don’t know what to believe. He had prime time with me and my brother in the guest room for two weeks,” he said. “And he didn’t try anything.”
As a footnote to all of this: In the small world of the Los Angeles music business, Bobby Newt recently worked with choreographer and alleged Jackson “victim” Wade Robson on tracks for his first album, a potential hit compendium of original R&B ballads.
Jackson’s former maid Blanca Francia implicated Robson in the case during Monday’s testimony. Robson is not testifying for the prosecution.
“Wade is straight as they come. He’s getting married. And nothing ever happened to him, either,” Newt said.
He shakes his head, thinking about those who have made claims against Jackson.
“You have to look at these people, go back and see when their relationship with Michael fractured. The calls stopped coming,” he said.
And Newt should know. After the adventure in 1985, the Newts never saw Jackson again. It didn’t bother them, Bobby says, as much as it might have others.
“They probably didn’t like it. And this is their way of getting back at him,” he said.